Legal Opinion
Klingenschmitt v. Weinstein
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided March 18, 2011No. 05-10-01149-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion By Justice FILLMORE.
This is an interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s denial of appellant Gordon Klingenschmitt’s special appearance. See Tex. Crv. PRác. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(7) (West 2008). We affirm the trial court’s denial of Klingenschmitt’s special appearance.
Background
In September 2009, appellees Michael L. Weinstein and Bonnie Weinstein filed suit against Klingenschmitt, Elmer Harmon Ammerman, and the Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches (CFGC). Klingenschmitt is not a resident of Texas. He filed a rule 120a special appearance contesting the trial court’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kawasaki Steel Corp. v. MiddletonTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Dawson-Austin v. AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Exito Electronics Co., Ltd. v. TrejoTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Ritchey v. VasquezTexas Supreme Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- James W. Trenz and Terrane Associates, Inc. v. Peter Paul Petroleum Company and Posse Energy, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
- Restrepo v. Alliance Riggers & Constructors, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Global Paragon Dallas, LLC and Ilan Zelnik v. SBM Realty, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Superior Broadcast Products v. Doud Media Group, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2012
- Benton Wilcoxon v. Sparkie Properties LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2025
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.