Legal Opinion

State ex rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Smith

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1924PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

It is the first contention of appellant’s counsel that the policy of insurance issued to the railroad company and the qoupons issued thereunder are not within or subject to the standard policy law of the state and therefore there is no subject matter within the jurisdiction of the commissioner.

Counsel point out that the principal object of the standard policy law was to promote uniformity in the administration of insurance law throughout the country; that the standard policy laws of Minnesota, Michigan, and Wisconsin are identical, but that the purpose of their enactment has been defeated in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Takao Ozawa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cartwright v. SharpeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. In Interest of G. & LpCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  3. Hull v. CollinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  4. State Department of Public Welfare v. PearsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Mared Industries, Inc. v. MansfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API