In Interest of G. & Lp
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
A. and A.P., parents of G.P. and L.P., appeal an order of the juvenile court directing them to reimburse Racine County for guardian ad litem fees rendered to their children as a result of a sec. 48.13, Stats., proceeding in which said children were alleged to he in need of protection or services. The juvenile court ruled that guardian ad litem services were included within the meaning of “legal counsel” as used in sec. 48.275(2) (a), Stats., 1 which provides in part:
If this state or a county provides legal counsel to a child subject to s. 48.12 or 48.13, the court shall order . . . the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- County of Milwaukee v. ProeglerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- Engineers & Scientists of Milwaukee, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Dobbs v. Joint School District No. 3Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Wood v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- Brauneis v. State, Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Fond Du Lac County v. Town of RosendaleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- Wagner Mobil, Inc. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Capoun Revocable Trust v. AnsariCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.