Legal Opinion
Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided July 14, 2014No. Civil Action No. H-11-3020; Bankruptcy Case No. 09-39895-H4-7; Adversary No. 10-03156PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MELINDA HARMON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the above referenced appeal by Appellant Husky International Electronics, Inc. (“Husky”), seeking a reversal of United States Bankruptcy Judge Jeff Bohm’s August 4, 2011 *515memorandum opinion and judgment1 in Adversary Proceeding 10-03156, discharging a $163,999.38 contractual debt owed by Chrysalis Manufacturing Corp. (“Chrysalis”) to Husky for goods Husky sold and delivered to Chrysalis from 2003 to 2007 under a contract and for which Husky has attempted to hold Appellee/Debtor Daniel Lee Ritz, Jr. (“Ritz”), a director…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz (In re Ritz)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
- White v. CyrDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020