State of Arizona v. Christopher Cruz Cuevas
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRAMMER, Judge.
¶ 1 The state appeals from the trial court’s grant of appellee Christopher Cuevas’s motion to suppress evidence that police had discovered following the traffic stop of a vehicle in which Cuevas was a passenger. The state argues the trial court erred in determining the police officer “could not have legitimately ‘suspected’ ” the driver had committed a traffic violation. We reverse.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 On appeal from a grant of a motion to suppress, we view the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s ruling. State v. Livingston,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. CarverArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Evenstad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- State v. Gonzalez-GutierrezArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Mejak v. GranvilleArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- State of Arizona v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.