Legal Opinion

Vercesi v. Petri

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1939No. Appeal, 65PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

Plaintiff, alleging that he and defendant were engaged as partners in the conduct of a restaurant and that defendant had evicted him from the business, brought a bill in equity for an accounting. Defendant denied the existence of the partnership and asserted that plaintiff was only an employee. A hearing was had and the chancellor found there was an oral agreement of partnership. This finding, supported by testimony and accepted by the court in banc, is conclusive on appeal. The chancellor, in his decree nisi, ordered an accounting, but the court in banc dismissed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Comstock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Frazier v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. v. Stroudsburg, Water GapSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Wilson v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  5. Robinson v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stauffer v. StaufferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Shapiro v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Hartman v. CohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Holst v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Goldberg v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API