Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Erickson v. University of Washington Physicians

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided October 7, 2004No. C99-1261-RPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING THE SEATTLE TIMES’ MOTION TO INTERVENE AND UNSEAL COURT FILE

ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on The Seattle Times’ Motion to Intervene *1125and Unseal Court File. Having reviewed this motion, and all responsive filings, and, being fully advised, the court finds and concludes as follows:

On August 3, 1999, Plaintiff-Relator Mark F. Erickson filed a False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., action against University of Washington Physicians, Children’s University Medical Group, and Association of University Physicians (collectively, “defendants” or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Coughlin v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1998
  2. United States Ex Rel. Mikes v. StrausDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  3. United States Ex Rel. Department of Defense v. CACI International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  4. United States v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1995

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Pentec Health, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. United States Ex Rel. Yannacopolous v. General DynamicsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  3. United States Ex Rel. Health Outcomes Technologies v. Hallmark Health System, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  4. United States Ex Rel. Rostholder v. Omnicare, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  5. PURCELL v. GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API