Legal Opinion
PURCELL v. GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 15, 2019No. 2:17-cv-03523Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHRIS PURCELL, et al. : CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 17-3523 GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. MEMORANDUM KEARNEY, J. November 15, 2019 As our Court of Appeals recently reminded us, we presume the public may access court filings. Requests to preclude public access must satisfy our rigorous analysis of the alleged basis. We may seal portions of public filings when, for example, the public filing contains investigative strategies employed by the United States or the disclosure would harm non-parties not involved with our deliberations. We…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Publicker Industries, Inc. v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- In Re: Cendant Corp., (Formerly Known as Cuc International, Inc.) Cendant Capital I Lester A. Goldstein, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated Welch & Forbes Inc., an Institutional Investment Manager, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Walter A. Forbes Cosmo Corigliano Anne M. Pember Merrill Lynch & Co. Chase Securities Inc. Henry R. Silverman v. Ernst & Young Cendant Membership Services, Inc. Casper Sabatino Steven P. Speaks Kevin T. Kearney Mary Sattler Howard SirotaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- In re: Avandia Marketing v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Leucadia, Inc. v. Applied Extrusion Technologies, Inc., Richard I. Burstein, Proposed IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.