Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Department of Defense v. CACI International Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 25, 1995No. 94 Civ. 2925 (RLC)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
Preliminary Statement
Plaintiff Pentagen Technologies International Ltd. (“Pentagen”) brought an action against defendant CACI International Inc. (“CACI”) and other defendants, as a “qui tam” relator pursuant to the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733 (1988) (“FCA” or the “Act”). Plaintiff United States of America (the “United States” or the “govern ment”) now notifies the court of its intention not to intervene in the action, pursuant to § 3730(b)(4)(B), and of its desire to prohibit all contents of the court’s files, save for the complaint, from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Kreindler & Kreindler, Cross-Appellee v. United Technologies Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States of America, Ex Rel. John Doe, Plaintiff-Relator-Appellant v. John Doe Corp. And John Doe, IICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States ex rel. Dick v. Long Island Lighting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States Ex Rel. Mikes v. StrausDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- United States Ex Rel. Mikes v. StrausDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Coughlin v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- United States ex rel. Littlewood v. King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- United States v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1995
- United States Ex Rel. Yannacopolous v. General DynamicsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- United States ex rel. Erickson v. University of Washington PhysiciansDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.