Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smith

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1993No. 2094PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

Appellants, John Smith and Anthony Tolbert, take this appeal from the Order of May 13, 1992 denying their post- verdict motion to dismiss the charge of third degree murder on double jeopardy and collateral estoppel grounds. Appellants were charged with criminal homicide, 1 kidnapping 2 and conspiracy, 3 as a result of the beating death of Hector Maldanado. After three days of deliberations, the jury acquitted appellants of first degree murder, second decree murder, voluntary manslaughter, kidnapping and conspiracy. The jury deadlocked on the charge of third degree murder.

On…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. WallaceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. WhartonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McCordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. TolbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. BreelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. CosgroveSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. BreelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API