Legal Opinion
Northwest Amusement Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1940PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
The defendant issued a mercantile burglary policy of insurance for direct loss by burglary of merchandise usual to assured’s business, being that of “Premium Store” at 106 Northeast Oregon street, for a period of twelve months beginning at noon on the 19th day of November, 1935, and ending at noon on the 19th day of November, 1936. The name appearing in the application for said policy, and which is incorporated in said policy as that of the assured is, “Ben Levin dba Northwest Amusement Co.”; and it is stated in said application and policy that the assured is an individual.
It is alleged in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Ingersoll v. Coal Creek Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- Sage v. HampeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Mercer v. Germania Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hendrix v. McKeeOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Bankers & Shippers Ins. Co. of NY v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Bowman v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Abbott v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1942
- Rhone v. LouisOregon Supreme Court · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.