Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co v. Wright

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8673PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

— It is claimed that the court erred in overruling the appellant’s demurrer for want of facts to the complaint of the appellee.

The complaint is long, and the giving of a copy is unnecessary. It charges the injury and destruction of two horses, harness, and a wagon of the plaintiff at a highway crossing of the track of the defendant’s road. It is charged in substance, that, at and on the north side of the crossing for a long distance, the railroad track lay in a deep cut, and was also obscured and concealed by a growth of underbrush and timber, on both sides of the track; that at the point of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Bruker v. KelseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. ConlanIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. PennellIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Town of Salem v. GollerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SandfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SteinIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Board of Commissioners v. LeggIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Hartman v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API