Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co v. Wright
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Madison Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.
— It is claimed that the court erred in overruling the appellant’s demurrer for want of facts to the complaint of the appellee.
The complaint is long, and the giving of a copy is unnecessary. It charges the injury and destruction of two horses, harness, and a wagon of the plaintiff at a highway crossing of the track of the defendant’s road. It is charged in substance, that, at and on the north side of the crossing for a long distance, the railroad track lay in a deep cut, and was also obscured and concealed by a growth of underbrush and timber, on both sides of the track; that at the point of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Bruker v. KelseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Pennsylvania Co. v. ConlanIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. PennellIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
- Town of Salem v. GollerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SandfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SteinIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Board of Commissioners v. LeggIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Hartman v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.