Mikell v. County of Charleston
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BEATTY, J.:
In this appeal from the rezoning of the Peter’s Point Planned Development, George Lee Mikell, Julia Mikell Flowers, Daisy Mikell Pedrick, Mary Mikell, John Mikell, and Peter’s Point Associates, LP, (hereinafter “Appellants”) 1 contend the master-in-equity erred in finding a conflict between the planned development and the Charleston County Zoning and Land Development Regulations (“ZLDR”) and subsequently voiding the planned development. We reverse. 2
FACTS
Appellants are the sole owners of 162 acres of land located on Edisto Island, South Carolina, also known as Peter’s Point…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Fleming v. RoseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Hitachi Data Systems Corp. v. LeathermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Mid-State Auto Auction of Lexington, Inc. v. AltmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Charleston County Parks & Recreation Commission v. SomersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mikell v. County of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Mikell v. County of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009