Legal Opinion
Martello v. Santana
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided June 15, 2012No. Civil Action No. 11-cv-93-KSFPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
KARL S. FORESTER, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon the motion filed by the Defendants, Joshua Santana, David Bratt, Robert Brown, Philip Fay, Ann Samani, Santana Law Office, PSC, Santana and Beiting, PSC, Santana and Fay, PSC, Santana, Fay & Bratt, PSC, Brown, Santana & Bratt, PSC, and Brown, Bucalos, Santana & Bratt, PSC (“Defendants”), for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [DE # 23]. This matter is fully briefed and ripe for review.
I. Factual Background
Plaintiff, Jeannette Martello, M.D. (“Martello”), is a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Williams v. CurtinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Greissman v. Rawlings & Assocs., PLLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Modern Holdings, LLC v. Corning, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022
- Modern Holdings, LLC v. Corning, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023