Legal Opinion

State v. Jerry Allan Hill

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 2012No. 38808PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Judge Pro Tem.

Jerry Allan Hill appeals from the judgment entered upon the jury verdict finding him guilty of three counts of grand theft, Idaho Code §§ 18-2403, 18-2407(1). He asserts that the district court erred in allowing irrelevant testimony by a witness at trial and by awarding the restitution amount sought by the State as a condition of probation. We affirm.

I

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The State charged Hill with three counts of grand theft from a real estate firm, Jordan, Hill and Hall Inc., dba GMAC Real Estate Northwest, of which Hill was a partner along with Brad Jordan and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. YagerIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. BybeeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. HamiltonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Ellis v. ButterfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. State v. Leroy S. WilskeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. State v. Donald Leonard HouserIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. Robert Eugene StewartIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State v. Lloyd Hardin McNeilIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API