Legal Opinion

Hoskins v. Stevens

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 21, 1947No. 32809PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, C.J.

This proceeding in mandamus was commenced by petitioner, L. Hoskins, to compel the respondent, J. Harvey Stevens, county treasurer of Tillman county, to issue petitioner a certificate tax deed covering a quarter section of land in Tillman county.

The case was tried on an agreed statement of facts, from which it appears that the land was sold to the county at the 1930 delinquent tax sale for the 1929 ad valorem taxes; that thereafter the tax sale certificate was duly assigned to petitioner who paid the ad valorem taxes for the subsequent years to and including those for 1938, and the payments…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Cummings v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Tuttle v. BlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Case v. PinnickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Turner v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Resolution Trust Corp. v. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. CALVERT v. SWINFORDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  3. Lake v. LietchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  4. Keota Mills & Elevator v. GambleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  5. PRICE v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PAWNEE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API