Legal Opinion
Runnells v. Quinn
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided January 27, 2006PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
[¶ 1] Muriel J. Quinn appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (York County, Brennan, J.) after a jury found that (1) Quinn had breached an implied contract with Robert Runnells, awarding Runnells $27,742; and (2) Run-nells had breached a warranty to Quinn, awarding Quinn $14,000. Quinn asserts that the trial court erred in (1) denying her motion for judgment as a matter of law on Runnells’s claim for quantum meru-it/implied contract; and (2) granting Run-nells’s motion for partial summary judgment on Quinn’s claims under the Home Construction Contract Act, 10 M.R.S. §§ 1486-1490…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Paffhausen v. BalanoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Forrest Associates v. Passamaquoddy TribeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Mahar v. StoneWood TransportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Landis v. Hannaford Bros. Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Granger Northern, Inc. v. CianchetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- White v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- Portland Co. v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Homeward Residential, Inc. v. GregorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- Michael Dinan v. Alpha Networks Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- JAY CASHMAN, INC. v. Portland Pipe Line Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.