Mahar v. StoneWood Transport
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.
[¶ 1] Ronald and Susan Mahar, individually and as parent and next friend of Kelsey Snowman, appeal from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Mead, C.J.) in favor of defendant StoneWood Transport. The Mahars’ complaint, filed against Stone-Wood and Frederick J. Linfield, arose out of the actions of Linfield who, in December of 1998, assaulted and threatened the Ma-hars on Route 9 between Bangor and Aurora. The Mahars contend that summary judgment was improperly entered in favor of StoneWood on their claims alleging (1) that StoneWood negligently hired and…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Curtis v. PorterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Murray's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
- Swanson v. Roman Catholic Bishop of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Lyons v. PathakCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Doe v. ForrestSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Zsigo v. Hurley Medical CenterMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Fortin v. Roman Catholic Bishop of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Peña v. GreffetDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Gomes v. University of Maine SystemDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.