In re Estate of Burdick
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County refusing to set apart a homestead to the widow of a deceased person. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
Kate Burdick is the surviving wife of Horace Burdick, deceased; and during his lifetime *640said Horace Burdick executed in due form, and had recorded a declaration of homestead upon the land involved herein. This land at the time said declaration was made was community property; and it remained the valid homestead of the husband and wife, who resided on it with their minor children, until the death of said Horace, which occurred May 7, 1887. On June 16, 1887, Frederick Eaton was appointed administrator of the estate of said Horace; and on October 6th, the surviving wife, Kate Burdick, filed her…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Bull v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Dickey v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Walkerly v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Oylear v. OylearIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Estate of Hessler, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.