State, Department of Natural Resources v. Tongass Conservation Society
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
In 1992 the Cape Fox Corporation and the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) agreed to a land exchange. Because the state land to be exchanged had an estimated value greater than $5,000,000, legislative approval was required. See AS 38.50.020(a); AS 38.50.140. DNR prepared a report on the proposed exchange as required by AS 38.50.130. The report, which found that the exchange was in the state’s interest, and the execution of the “Final Exchange Agreement” concluded administrative proceedings concerning the exchange.
The Tongass Conservation Society (Ton-gass) filed a…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- DeSalvo v. BryantAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Alaska Wildlife Alliance v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Kanuk Ex Rel. Kanuk v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Halloran v. State, Division of ElectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Jerue v. MillettAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.