Jerue v. Millett
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION *
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This appeal concerns attorney's fees and indemnification disputes arising after the superior court dismissed a derivative suit brought by shareholders of an Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) village corporation. The plaintiffs sued without first making the pre-suit demand Alaska law requires. After the superior court dismissed the complaint for mootness, both sides sought attorney's fees and costs. Concluding that the shareholders did not prove that a pre-suit demand was excused, the superior court held that they were not prevailing parties…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McDonnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Interior Cabaret, Hotel, Restaurant & Retailers Ass'n v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium v. Settlement Funds Ex Rel. E.R.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Halloran v. State, Division of ElectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Hertz v. BeachAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.