Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 27, 1974No. 74-7, C.A.D. 1131Published

1ConcurrenceMiller, Judge

The following statement in the majority opinion (with which I concur) should be amplified: “We find no significant evidence in the record that organs of the type in which the importations are used are ever sold without cabinets.” The inference is that the decision would have been different if such evidence had been present. However, in Authentic Furniture Products, Inc. v. United States, 61 CCPA 5, 486 F. 2d 1062, C.A.D. 1109 (1973), there was ample evidence that the importations involved were advertised and sold without “essential” parts, but the majority, nevertheless, held that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Authentic Furniture Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. Twin Pin Co. of U. S. A. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API