Twin Pin Co. of U. S. A. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mollison, Judge:
This protest relates to merchandise described on the invoice as “Wooden Clothes Pin Bottom Parts” and as “Wooden Clothes Pin Top Parts.” The parts referred to were assessed with duty at the rate of 33}4 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 412) for—
* * * manufactures of wood * * *, or of which wood * * * is the component material of chief value, not specially provided for * * *.
They are claimed to be properly dutiable at the rate of 10 cents per gross under the provision in the same paragraph and act, as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pan American Airways, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
3Cited by5 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- Prescolite Mfgr. Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Authentic Furniture Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974