Legal Opinion
Lamb v. W-Energy, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 7, 1989No. 87-1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff appeals from an order of the district court granting summary judgment for defendants, holding them to be “statutory employers” within the meaning of Utah Code Ann § 35-1-60 and 35-1-62 (1974) (amended 1975). The pertinent facts and the analysis of the district court may be found in Lamb v. W-Energy, Inc., 663…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Coca Cola Bottling Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Welyczko v. U.S. Air, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Clark-Cowlitz Joint Operating Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Andrews v. ShulsenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mary Goheen v. Yellow Freight SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Imogene Williams v. United States Elevator Corporation and Elcon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Imogene Williams v. United States Elevator Corporation and Elcon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Lamb v. Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989