Legal Opinion · Dissent

Imogene Williams v. United States Elevator Corporation and Elcon Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 11, 1990No. 89-7180Published

1DissentEdwards, Circuit Judge

I dissent because I believe that this case must be remanded for a new trial in light of an intervening change in the law.

At the time when this case was tried, District of Columbia law precluded an award of damages for emotional distress that was not caused by some physical injury. Subsequent to the trial in this case, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals discarded the legal requirement that, to be compensable, emotional harm must be caused by physical injury. During the jury deliberations in this case, the jury specifically asked the trial judge whether the plaintiff was barred from…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API