Legal Opinion

Kane v. Ferguson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 27, 1945No. 31692PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a motion to vacate a judgment alleged to be void. The judgment sought to be vacated was rendered in the action hereinafter detailed.

On December 28, 1920, Sulpa Kane and Cora Kane, husband and wife, commenced an action in the district court of Seminole county against Walter Ferguson wherein in a first cause of action they sought to recover possession of a tract of land alleged to be the family homestead of plaintiffs. The basis of their claim was that the husband, Sulpa Kane, had executed a warranty deed purporting to convey said land to defendant and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. HandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. Kelly v. RoetzelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Oklahoma Transportation Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Lamb v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Davenport v. JamisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ReedNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Dodd v. DoddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API