Legal Opinion

Diggs v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 23, 2000No. AC 19465PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The petitioner, James Diggs, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The sole issue raised on appeal is that “[t]he habeas court erred when it denied the petition for writ of habeas corpus.” Following a review of the record and briefs and after hearing the parties at oral argument, we conclude that the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing that he has been denied a state or federal constitutional right. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

The record discloses that the petitioner was convicted…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. McClamConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. State v. DiggsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Diggs v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Superior Court · 1999
  4. Scott v. SalinasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Littlefield v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API