Legal Opinion
Robert Scott Gardner v. International Telegraph Employees Local No. 9
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 21, 1988No. 86-2417PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
Gardner appeals the dismissal of his action as barred by the statute of limitations. Gardner’s complaint contained two claims: (1) his union did not process a grievance on his behalf and thereby violated its duty of fair representation to him; and (2) his union violated section 104 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA), 29 U.S.C. § 414, by failing to give him a copy of the collective bargaining agreement. 1 The district court found both claims barred by a six-month statute of limitations, relying on DelCostello v. International Bhd. of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151, 103 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Simo v. Union Of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Clyde Allen v. United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, ClcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Legutko v. Local 816, International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Maurer v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 569District Court, S.D. California · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.