Gehret v. Mitten Bank Securities Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Kellee, P. J.,
These three appeals raise practically the same question and, though argued separately, may be disposed of together in one opinion.
All three cases were actions in assumpsit brought by the respective plaintiffs against the defendant to recover from it the par value, ($25 per share), of preferred stock issued by the defendant to the several plaintiffs under an offer and proposal to buy back the same at $25 per share,—less a service charge of twenty-five cents per share—at any time the purchaser would request defendant to do so, if done prior to the said stock being listed…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Parry v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Gross v. Exeter Machine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Tamaqua Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Fritz v. HathawaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Chestnut Street National Bank v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- National Cash Register Co. v. AnsellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Epstein v. KramerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Hakum v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co. v. Pittsburgh United Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- P.-Pbgh. Tr. Co. v. Pbgh. U. Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.