Legal Opinion

Epstein v. Kramer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1953No. Appeal, 60PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

This appeal is from an order refusing the defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings which consisted of a complaint in assumpsit, an answer to the merits also setting forth an affirmative defense under new matter and a reply to the new matter. As the order is manifestly interlocutory, its appealability was raised at bar and the ensuing discussion has since been supplemented by further briefs of the parties. The defendant, contending that snch an order is appealable, relies upon the ruling in Colonial Securities Co. v. Levy (No. 1), 301 Pa. 229, 230-231, 151…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rohm & Haas Co. v. LessnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Colonial SEC. Co. v. Levy (No. 2)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Smith v. SchollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Colonial SEC. Co. v. Levy (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Gehret v. Mitten Bank Securities Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. McGee v. SINGLEYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Wark & Co. v. Twelfth & Sansom Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Syme v. Bankers National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API