Legal Opinion

Sterling v. Reecher

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 17, 1939No. [No. 21, April Term, 1939.]PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

The question in controversy is: which period of limitations under the Maryland statutes, three years or twelve years, applies to suits to enforce by a receiver the double liability of stockholders in trust companies under the provisions of the Code, art. 11, sec. 72, in force prior to 1937. The Central Trust Company’s stockholders were not relieved of that liability by the Act of 1937, ch. 81, Code, art. 11, sec. 72A; their liability had been previously established. The statute imposing it contained no express limitation on the suit, such as is found in statutes in some other jurisdictions.

It…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Glenn v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  2. Corning & Horner v. McCulloughNew York Court of Appeals · 1847
  3. Marshall v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  4. Stockholders of Peoples Banking Co. v. SterlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Mattare v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Roland Electrical Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  2. Mattingly v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Master Financial, Inc. v. CrowderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Taggart v. Wachter, Hoskins & Russel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  5. McIver v. RussellDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API