Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 19, 1933No. [No. 49, October Term, 1932.]PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUenee, J.

This case is governed by the principle of the decisions in Spear v. Spear, 158 Md. 672, 149 A. 468; Dickey v. Dickey, 154 Md. 675, 141 A. 387, 388; Newbold v. Newbold, 133 Md. 170, 104 A. 366; and Emerson v. Emerson, 120 Md. 584, 87 A. 1033. It was determined in those cases that a decree of divorce which, in accordance with an agreement of the parties, made provisions for the wife beyond the period and scope of alimony allowances, was not subject to later rescission or modification, with respect to such provisions, on the husband’s petition.

The decree in the present case, after granting the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dickey v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  2. Emerson v. EmersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  3. Hood v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  4. Demuth v. Old Town BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  5. Wallingsford v. WallingsfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1825

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Winkel v. WinkelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  2. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  3. Bradford v. FutrellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. McClanahan v. HawkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Korczyk v. SolonkaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API