Legal Opinion

Hourigan v. Township of North Bergen

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 12, 1934PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heheb, J.

The relators are judgment creditors of respondent township. They .applied to the Supreme Court for writs of mandamus to compel the taxing authorities of the township to assess and levy, in addition to regular taxes, the amounts due upon the executions issued upon the judgments. The applications were denied. Thereafter the causes were consolidated, and the pleadings moulded, and judgment was entered overruling the demurrer to the return made bjr respondents to the alternative writ of mandamus. Relators appeal from this judgment, and from the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Manigault v. SpringsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Chastleton Corp. v. SinclairSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Bronson v. KinzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1843

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hutton Pk. Gardens v. West Orange Town CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  2. In Re BlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Como Farms, Inc. v. ForanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  4. Sabato v. SabatoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  5. UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API