Legal Opinion
Lassen v. Hoyt Livery, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 5, 2015No. Case No. 3:13-cv-01529 (VAB)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
VICTOR A. BOLDEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Roger Lassen, Jr., brought this action on behalf of himself and other similarly situated individuals against Defendants, Hoyt Livery, Inc., Santo Silvestro, and Lynda Silvestro, under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and the Connecticut Minimum Wage Act (“CMWA”), Conn. GemStat. § 31-58 et seq, The Complaint [Doc. No. 1] asserts claims under three counts; (1) a collective action claim under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) for violation of the overtime provisions of the FLSA (“Count One”);…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sikiotis v. Vitesse Worldwide Chaufeeured Services, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Aquino v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Aquino v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Panagiotis Kasseris, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated employees v. ZA & D Service Station, Inc.; Anthony Koulizakis; Nikolas KoulizakisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026
- Rael v. Q3 Contracting, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.