Legal Opinion

Aquino v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 20, 2023No. 1:22-cv-04267Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT USDC SDNY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUMENT So ESSER ELECTRONICALLY FILED ANTHONY AQUINO, individually and on DOC #: behalf of all others similarly situated, et al., DATE FILED: 4/20/2023 Plaintiffs, 22-CV-4267 (KHP) -against- OPINION & ORDER UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. +--+ ----X KATHARINE H. PARKER, United States Magistrate Judge: Anthony Aquino (“Plaintiff”) is a driver for Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”). He brings claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201, and the New York Labor Law (“NYLL”), Article 6 § 190…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API