Slimick v. Silva
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
SUMMARY
Maxine and Robert Slimick, Chapter 7 debtors, appeal from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) dismissal of their appeal from the bankruptcy court’s decision as untimely. 87 B.R. 98. The BAP found that the notice of appeal was not filed within the ten-day period set by Bankruptcy Rule 8002(a) and no unique circumstances existed warranting review nevertheless. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
On April 21, 1983, the Slimicks filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which was converted on February 16, 1984, to Chapter 7. In their initial schedules, they elected the general federal…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re SlimickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Jim Lee Wiersma in Re Patricia Darlene Wiersma, Debtors, Jim Lee Wiersma Patricia Darlene Wiersma v. Bank of the West, F/k/a United California Bank, United States Trustee, Trustee-Appellee. In Re Jim Lee Wiersma in Re Patricia Darlene Wiersma, Debtors, Bank of the West, F/k/a United California Bank v. Jim Lee Wiersma Patricia Darlene WiersmaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- In Re SchimmelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States ex rel. Rudd v. SchimmelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Gregory v. State of MontanaDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.