Legal Opinion

Commercial Jewelry Co. v. Dente

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 4, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

General Assumpsit to recover payment of two drafts accepted by defendant. Trial by court at the March Term, 1909, Washington County, Sail, J., presiding. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant excepted.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

This case was'brought here by the defendant. When it was reached, he was not ready, and at his request, it was left with the Court, under an order granting leave to the ex-ceptant to file the printed case and his brief within a time specified, and providing that judgment should be affirmed in case he failed to comply with the order. He did not comply.

There is reason to believe that the real force and effect of such an order as was made in this case are not fully appreciated by the members of the bar. We take this opportunity, therefore, to make the matter plain. Orders of this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taft v. TaftSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  2. Sutton v. JonesColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Pilger v. StrassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Plymouth Clothing House v. SeymourSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Myers v. City of JeffersonvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. DunnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API