Legal Opinion

Davis v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 6, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Case for malpractice. Plea, the general issue. Trial by-court at the September Term, 1914, Windham County, Waterman, J., presiding. Judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff excepted. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.

This case was tried by the court. The findings of fact were filed, judgment was rendered for the defendant, and exceptions to the judgment were filed, all on the same day, November 30, 1914. Later an amended bill of exceptions was filed, and finally on January 3, 1916, a substitute bill was filed. In the last named bill, the transcript of the evidence is referred to in respect to the exceptions taken during the trial and is made a part thereof for that purpose ! ‘ and shall control according to rule 31, section 2, of the (new) county court rules. It is made the bill of exceptions in this…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. JenningsIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Ide v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  3. Rowell v. Fuller's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887
  4. Hassam v. J. E. Safford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  5. Smith v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1907

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. State v. LapanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  3. Goulette's Administrator v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  4. Loomis v. AbelsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API