Pilger v. Strassman
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This cause is before the court upon the motion of respondents to dismiss the appeals from the judgment and order denying appellants’ motion for a new trial, upon the ground that appellants have failed to file any points and authorities within the time prescribed by the rules of this court. It appears from the moving papers that the transcript of appeal was filed, after a long extension had been given for filing the same, on May 22, 1897; that after the filing of the transcript appellants were given by respondents an extension of fifty-two days beyond the thirty days allowed by the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Berendsen v. BabdatyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Commercial Jewelry Co. v. DenteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910