Legal Opinion
Van Asten v. State Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided October 8, 1997No. 96-1835PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.
The State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation appeals and Floyd J. and Irene M. Van Asten (the Van Astens) cross-appeal from an order awarding postverdict litigation expenses to the Van Astens under § 32.28(3)(e), STATS. Because we agree with the Department’s argument, that the jury verdict of $600,000 failed to exceed by at least $700 and at least 15% the $525,000 jurisdictional offer or the $525,000 highest written offer for the property condemned, thus requiring denial of the motion for litigation expenses under § 32.28(3)(e), we reverse the order.
The Van Astens owned property in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sweet v. BergeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Maxey v. Redevelopment Authority of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Redevelopment Authority of Green Bay v. Bee Frank, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp. v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Green Bay Broadcasting Co. v. Redevelopment Authority of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Spiegelberg v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- County of Clark v. Sun State Properties, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States v. Redevelopment Authority of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- WISCONSIN MALL PROPERTIES, LLC v. Younkers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.