Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Tobacco Co. v. Shotz

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold Hyman, J.

Defendants move for a change of place of trial from Queens County to Albany County. The basis for their application is allegedly "convenience of material witnesses.”

Plaintiff moves pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7; subd [b]) to dismiss the "first” and "second” affirmative defenses and counterclaims of defendant, Cooper, on the ground that they state neither a defense nor counterclaim; and, to dismiss the "fourth defense and first counterclaim” and, the "fifth defense and second counterclaim” of the defendant, Irving Shotz "on the grounds that they…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Niles v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. von Au v. MagenheimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. Gordon v. EllimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Tillie Von Au v. MagenheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Saxe, Bacon & Bolan, P.C. v. Martindale-Hubbell, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  2. Teltronics Services, Inc. v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API