Legal Opinion

Muller v. Muller

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1965No. Civ. 22264PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.

— Defendant, William Muller, appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion to vacate the default judgment and the default entered against him on May 19, 1954 and April 24, 1953, respectively. Said judgment provided that a certain deed was proved and quieted title to certain real property in favor of plaintiff, Lelah Muller.

Defendant's motion to vacate, made on July 5, 1963, was based on the ground that the judge who rendered that judgment was disqualified under the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 170, subdivision 4, 1 and that therefore the purported judgment was void.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. People v. PantagesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Beaty v. McGrawCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  2. People v. OaxacaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Lagies v. CopleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Muller v. TannerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Develop-Amatic Engineering v. REPUBLIC MORTGAGECalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API