State v. Rohrig
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Fayette District Court. — Hon. A. N. Hobson, Judge. Disbarment proceedings. The defendant was found guilty. There was a judgment revoking his license to practice law, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
There were fourteen accusations against the defendant, eight of which were sustained, and the defendant was acquitted of the other sis. The abstract contains only the evidence as to the accusations upon which the defendant was found guilty. The charges which' were sustained grow out of the defendant’s dealings and connection with five matters, which we shall designate as the Steinke, Edmunds, Kammos, Truair, and Tarr matters. The defendant specifically denied all the accusations against him.
I. As to the Steinke matter, the specifications in the accusation are substantially that defendant used…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Ex parte FinnOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- In re OWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- State v. MosherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Somers v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State ex rel. Spillman v. PriestNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- In Re Disbarment of CloudSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- State v. MetcalfeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- State v. KaufmannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.