Buckle v. Caylor
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Abbott, J.:
This is an appeal by Jim Buckle, a farm tenant, from a judgment denying his motion for partial summary judgment and granting the Caylors, the landlord, judgment on the pleadings.
Buckle contends that summary judgment is inappropriate because material controverted questions of fact remain and also that the trial court erred in interpreting and applying the statutory law (K.S.A. 58-2501 et seq.) governing farm tenancies.
The trial court granted the Caylors judgment on the pleadings, but it is obvious that the trial court considered affidavits filed by the respective parties in arriving…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Paul v. City of ManhattanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Secrist v. TurleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Grey v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- Becker v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Mouber v. City of Prairie VillageCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mendenhall v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
- Missouri Bank & Trust Co. v. Gas-Mart Development Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
- Geren v. GerenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
- Orebaugh v. LeatherwoodCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
- Concrete Accessories Co. v. MosesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004