Legal Opinion

Orebaugh v. Leatherwood

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 14, 2000No. 83,380PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, J.:

Valere Orebaugh appeals the district court’s judgment declaring that Carl and Michelle Leatherwood substantially complied with the statutory requirements for termination of a farm tenancy and that Orebaugh was not entitled to plant wheat on a portion of the land in the fall of 1998.

Beginning in 1995, Orebaugh farmed a tract of ground owned by Norval and Keith Jackson. Their agreement was oral and was a year-to-year tenancy. This was a typical agrarian arrangement where the tenant received % of the crop produced and tire owner received Vs. It was customary in the vicinity to leave…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mendenhall v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
  2. Grey v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. Becker v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  4. Buckle v. CaylorCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1985
  5. Servos v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Geren v. GerenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
  2. Foster v. SCHWICKERATHCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2009
  3. Annex Properties, LLC v. TNS Research InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  4. Annex Properties, LLC v. TNS Research InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API