Legal Opinion
Keasbey & Mattison Co. v. Rothensies
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 2, 1941No. 1248PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a Pennsylvania corporation having its principal place of business at Ambler, Pennsylvania, within this District, brought suit against the defendant, the Collector of Internal Revenue, for recovery of $7,058.21.
The complaint sets forth that the action arises under the Internal Revenue laws of the United States; that the complainant paid to the Province of Quebec, Canada, under the provisions of the Quebec Mining Act, taxes in the amount of $10,072.26 for the complainant’s fiscal and taxable year ending March 31, 1937; that in the income tax return which…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tahir Erk v. Glenn L. Martin Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Dainese v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
3Cited by6 opinions
- Iafrate v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Ritter v. Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- Montgomery v. KingslandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- United States v. National City Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Chemacid, S.A. v. Ferrotar Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.