Legal Opinion

Hollon v. Clary

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 2003No. 19826PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, William M. Hollon, appeals from a summary judgment rendered against him in favor of his employer’s automobile insurance carrier, Twin City Mutual Fire Insurance Company, finding that no uninsured and underinsured motorists (“UM/UIM”) coverage exists by operation of law, because there was a valid written offer and rejection of UM/UIM coverage. Hollon contends that the trial court erred in rendering summary judgment in favor of Twin City, since the written offer and rejection of UM/UIM coverage is not valid, because it fails to meet the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Gyori v. Johnston Coca-Cola Bottling Group, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Linko v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Kemper v. Michigan Millers Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Akins v. Harco InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Hollon v. ClaryOhio Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API