Hollon v. Clary
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Fain, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, William M. Hollon, appeals from a summary judgment rendered against him in favor of his employer’s automobile insurance carrier, Twin City Mutual Fire Insurance Company, finding that no uninsured and underinsured motorists (“UM/UIM”) coverage exists by operation of law, because there was a valid written offer and rejection of UM/UIM coverage. Hollon contends that the trial court erred in rendering summary judgment in favor of Twin City, since the written offer and rejection of UM/UIM coverage is not valid, because it fails to meet the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Gyori v. Johnston Coca-Cola Bottling Group, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Linko v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Kemper v. Michigan Millers Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Akins v. Harco InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Hollon v. ClaryOhio Supreme Court · 2004