Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Townsend
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 7, 2008No. 07-1324UnpublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PER CURIAM,
David Johnson, proceeding pro se, appeals the District Court’s orders granting defendants’ motions to dismiss and for summary judgment. We affirm.
In December 2003, Johnson filed the underlying civil rights action naming various administrative officials and correctional officers from SCI-Rockview. After being granted leave, Johnson filed an amended complaint on March 3, 2004 and a second amended complaint on December 21, 2004 against the following defendants: Benjamin Townsend, Food Service Supervisor; Jeffrey Rackovan, Grievance Coordinator and Assistant Superintendent; J.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Benner v. WolfDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Bhatti v. The Republican Caucus of the Pennsylvania House of RepresentativesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- CHANEY v. BEDNARDDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Cooper v. RansomDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Dinkins v. PotopeDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.