Bridges v. Vasquez
District Court, N.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HINKLE, District Judge.
This action presents the recurring issue of whether a federal defendant may invoke 28 U.S.C. § 2241 to challenge his or her conviction or sentence as violating the rule of constitutional law adopted in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). The issue is important because the usual vehicle for presenting a post-conviction challenge to a federal conviction or sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255, is unavailable at this time for -the presentation of the Apprendi issue by a federal defendant who has…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- King v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
- Rumler v. HemingwayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Bolden v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Myles v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
- Robinson v. HemingwayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.