Legal Opinion
Bolden v. United States
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided February 21, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01289Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 STEVEN ALEXANDER BOLDEN, Case No. C19-1289 RSM 10 11 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION UNDER
28 U.S.C. § 2255
12 v. 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 14 Respondent. 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 Before the Court is Petitioner’s
28 U.S.C. § 2255
Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or 18 Correct Sentence. Dkt. #1. Petitioner Steven Alexander Bolden challenges the 120-month 19 sentence imposed on him by this Court following his guilty plea for filing a false tax return, 20 wire fraud, and aggravated identity theft.
Id.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Benito Jiminian, - V- John Nash, Warden Fci Ray BrookCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Kim Chambers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Wayne Porter,petitioner-Appellant v. Mike Adams, Warden,respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Bridges v. VasquezDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.